B.C. government doesn't support Kinder Morgan's pipeline expansion

The B.C. government says it cannot support Kinder Morgan’s proposal to expand its Trans Mountain oil pipeline because the current proposal does not meet five conditions the province has set in place for such projects.

“We need to have world-leading land spill response,” said Environment Minister Mary Polack in a January 11 press conference.

article continues below

“We haven’t seen the evidence presented in these hearings that would convince us of that.”

National Energy Board hearings on the controversial project are currently underway. On January 19, interveners will begin giving oral arguments for why the project should or shouldn’t proceed at a public hearing in Burnaby that will run through January 29, and in Calgary in February.

The NEB has been criticized for becoming overly politicized under the Stephen Harper government in favour of the oil industry. In a decision that prompted a number of interveners to withdraw in protest from the hearings, the NEB decided that it would not allow interveners to cross-examine Kinder Morgan.

Instead, they were forced to pose written “information requests.” The result has been a flurry of 17,000 written information requests, not all of which answered questions to interveners’ satisfaction.

The B.C. government, for example, asked how many SCADA alarms Kinder Morgan receives on its pipelines annually, and how many result in precautionary shutdowns. 

SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) are automated systems used in industrial infrastructure like pipelines, power stations and nuclear power plants. 

These systems use computer-controlled sensors, cameras, shutoff valves and alarms. On pipelines, they detect leaks and ruptures that can result in a pipeline being shut down.

Kinder Morgan flatly rejected the B.C. government’s information request, saying it was “not relevant.”  The B.C. government disagreed. 

“Information concerning the effectiveness of leak detection and the promptness of shutdowns on the existing TMPL system and all Kinder Morgan pipelines is directly relevant to the company’s ‘track record’ with respect to the safe operation of its pipelines,” it wrote to the NEB. “The province requires such information in order to assess Trans Mountain’s ability to operate the proposed pipeline safely.” 

Polack said her government continues to work with the oil and gas industry on the five conditions, which include successfully completing the environmental review process; a world-leading marine and land spill response regime; addressing Aboriginal and treaty rights and ensuring First Nations benefit from projects; and ensuring British Columbia receives its “fair share” of financial and economic benefit.

While she is confident the government and industry are getting close to meeting the land spill response condition, which is entirely under the purview of the provincial government, marine spill response is another question.

Jurisdiction for marine spills is federal. A 2013 Transport Canada tanker safety review found major deficiencies in Canada’s current oil spill response requirements. The biggest problem identified was a “rigid” national approach that did not take into account regional coastline differences.

Transport Canada is currently working on introducing a new model based on the review panel’s recommendations.

Information gaps in how a marine spill would be dealt with is the main sticking point for the B.C. government. According to the province’s submission to the NEB:

“Trans Mountain has not filed the information required  by the province in order to assess its ability to respond to a spill in a timely  and effective manner. The heavily redacted Emergency Management Program documents Trans Mountain has filed do not enable the province to determine whether Trans Mountain is prepared and able to respond to a project-related spill.

Had Trans Mountain provided sufficient  information in this proceeding to enable the Province to conclude that it would have world-class marine and terrestrial spill prevention and response capacity, then the Province would have been in a position to support  the issuance of a certificate for the Project. However, this is not the case.”

But Polack said ongoing significant opposition from First Nations groups is also a barrier to the province’s support for the project. The Tsleil-Waututh First Nation, whose territory is around Burrard Inlet, where oil tanker traffic would increase from five per month to 34, applied to the Federal Court of Appeal to halt the project on the basis the Nation was not properly consulted. 

The deadline for the NEB to submit its final recommendation to the Governor in Council is May 20, 2016.

news@biv.com

@bizinvancouver

For business news go to biv.com

Read Related Topics

Comments

NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Vancouver Courier welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus

Popular Vancouver Courier

Sign Up For Our e-Newsletter!
Find the Vancouver Courier Newspaper